<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:adano="http://adambrown.info/p/xmlns/adano#" 
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Candidate Quality, the Personal Vote, and the Incumbency Advantage in Congress</title>
	<atom:link href="http://abstractpolitics.com/2008/04/candidate-quality-the-personal-vote-and-the-incumbency-advantage-in-congress/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://abstractpolitics.com/2008/04/candidate-quality-the-personal-vote-and-the-incumbency-advantage-in-congress/</link>
	<description>Reviewing the latest research in political science</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Jul 2010 22:58:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: The Declining Talent Pool of Government &#8211; Abstract Politics</title>
		<link>http://abstractpolitics.com/2008/04/candidate-quality-the-personal-vote-and-the-incumbency-advantage-in-congress/comment-page-1/#comment-178</link>
		<dc:creator>The Declining Talent Pool of Government &#8211; Abstract Politics</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 May 2010 16:12:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://abstractpolitics.com/?p=8#comment-178</guid>
		<description>[...] scientists have had lots and lots and lots and lots and lots and lots and lots and lots and lots to say about what might cause the incumbency [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] scientists have had lots and lots and lots and lots and lots and lots and lots and lots and lots to say about what might cause the incumbency [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Campaign Communications in U.S. Congressional Elections &#8211; Abstract Politics</title>
		<link>http://abstractpolitics.com/2008/04/candidate-quality-the-personal-vote-and-the-incumbency-advantage-in-congress/comment-page-1/#comment-109</link>
		<dc:creator>Campaign Communications in U.S. Congressional Elections &#8211; Abstract Politics</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2009 19:16:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://abstractpolitics.com/?p=8#comment-109</guid>
		<description>[...] ownership.Note 3: Mayhew (1974), Jacobson (1987), Cox and Katz (1996), Carson et al (2007) (also Carson et al), etc.Note 4: Isn&#8217;t that always true, though? Damn tenure pressure.Note 5: I choose these two [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] ownership.Note 3: Mayhew (1974), Jacobson (1987), Cox and Katz (1996), Carson et al (2007) (also Carson et al), etc.Note 4: Isn&#8217;t that always true, though? Damn tenure pressure.Note 5: I choose these two [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
