<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:adano="http://adambrown.info/p/xmlns/adano#" 
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Using Experiments to Estimate the Effects of Education on Voter Turnout</title>
	<atom:link href="http://abstractpolitics.com/2010/02/using-experiments-to-estimate-the-effects-of-education-on-voter-turnout/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://abstractpolitics.com/2010/02/using-experiments-to-estimate-the-effects-of-education-on-voter-turnout/</link>
	<description>Reviewing the latest research in political science</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Jul 2010 22:58:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Matt <span class="status">Unregistered</span></title>
		<link>http://abstractpolitics.com/2010/02/using-experiments-to-estimate-the-effects-of-education-on-voter-turnout/comment-page-1/#comment-135</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt <span class="status">Unregistered</span></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 20:16:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://abstractpolitics.com/?p=172#comment-135</guid>
		<description>Okay, so education causes turnout. Then how do we explain Brody&#039;s paradox about turnout not rising since the 1960s even though education levels have risen? Seems all the more paradoxical now.

I would guess that education has a sorting effect of sorting people into classes, and it&#039;s the higher classes that turn out more. If you can randomly induce one group to get more education and thereby end up in a higher class, then they experience an entirely different set of peer pressures when it comes to turnout than they would experience in a lower class. And those social pressures could be the proximate cause of higher turnout. &lt;a href=&quot;http://abstractpolitics.com/2008/05/social-pressure-and-voter-turnout/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;This article&lt;/a&gt; would seem to support that sort of mechanism.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Okay, so education causes turnout. Then how do we explain Brody&#8217;s paradox about turnout not rising since the 1960s even though education levels have risen? Seems all the more paradoxical now.</p>
<p>I would guess that education has a sorting effect of sorting people into classes, and it&#8217;s the higher classes that turn out more. If you can randomly induce one group to get more education and thereby end up in a higher class, then they experience an entirely different set of peer pressures when it comes to turnout than they would experience in a lower class. And those social pressures could be the proximate cause of higher turnout. <a href="http://abstractpolitics.com/2008/05/social-pressure-and-voter-turnout/" rel="nofollow">This article</a> would seem to support that sort of mechanism.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
