<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:adano="http://adambrown.info/p/xmlns/adano#" 
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Declining Talent Pool of Government</title>
	<atom:link href="http://abstractpolitics.com/2010/05/the-declining-talent-pool-of-government/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://abstractpolitics.com/2010/05/the-declining-talent-pool-of-government/</link>
	<description>Notes on political science research</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2012 21:06:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam <span class="status">The post author</span></title>
		<link>http://abstractpolitics.com/2010/05/the-declining-talent-pool-of-government/comment-page-1/#comment-219</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam <span class="status">The post author</span></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jul 2010 22:58:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://abstractpolitics.com/?p=218#comment-219</guid>
		<description>My extension of the logic to U.S. elections is imperfect. But why must there be a singular authority determining talent? (Even if we needed one, the median voter could play that role.) The point is that incumbents know that voters would rather have the devil they know than the devil they don&#039;t, and that dynamic allows for some underperformance, defined however you wish.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My extension of the logic to U.S. elections is imperfect. But why must there be a singular authority determining talent? (Even if we needed one, the median voter could play that role.) The point is that incumbents know that voters would rather have the devil they know than the devil they don&#8217;t, and that dynamic allows for some underperformance, defined however you wish.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: guest <span class="status">Unregistered</span></title>
		<link>http://abstractpolitics.com/2010/05/the-declining-talent-pool-of-government/comment-page-1/#comment-218</link>
		<dc:creator>guest <span class="status">Unregistered</span></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jul 2010 20:44:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://abstractpolitics.com/?p=218#comment-218</guid>
		<description>What about the fact that, in the U.S. scenario at least, the incumbent may have been herself a &quot;benchwarmer&quot;? It seems the British example is more applicable because there is a singler authority determining which cabinet members constitute the &quot;talent&quot; and which potential members constitute the &quot;benchwarmers.&quot;  How would that be determined in the U.S.?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What about the fact that, in the U.S. scenario at least, the incumbent may have been herself a &#8220;benchwarmer&#8221;? It seems the British example is more applicable because there is a singler authority determining which cabinet members constitute the &#8220;talent&#8221; and which potential members constitute the &#8220;benchwarmers.&#8221;  How would that be determined in the U.S.?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

