<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	
	xmlns:adano="http://adambrown.info/p/xmlns/adano#" 
>

<channel>
	<title>Abstract Politics &#187; ideology</title>
	<atom:link href="http://abstractpolitics.com/tag/ideology/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://abstractpolitics.com</link>
	<description>Notes on political science research</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 14 Oct 2011 20:23:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>New Measures of Partisanship, Ideology, and Policy Mood in the American States</title>
		<link>http://abstractpolitics.com/2010/10/new-measures-of-partisanship-ideology-and-policy-mood-in-the-american-states/</link>
		<comments>http://abstractpolitics.com/2010/10/new-measures-of-partisanship-ideology-and-policy-mood-in-the-american-states/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Oct 2010 16:34:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Adam</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[American Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ideology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[methodology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[partisanship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[public opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[state politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[state politics and policy quarterly]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://abstractpolitics.com/?p=314</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Over the years, political scientists have come up with lots of different ways to measure each state&#8217;s relative ideology. We all have a general sense that Utah, Idaho, and Mississippi lie to the right of Massachusetts, Hawaii, and California, but it&#8217;s helpful to put exact numbers on those differences. Many folks have relied on Erikson, [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://abstractpolitics.com/2010/10/new-measures-of-partisanship-ideology-and-policy-mood-in-the-american-states/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A Matter of Context: Christian Right Influence in U.S. State Republican Politics</title>
		<link>http://abstractpolitics.com/2010/10/a-matter-of-context-christian-right-influence-in-u-s-state-republican-politics/</link>
		<comments>http://abstractpolitics.com/2010/10/a-matter-of-context-christian-right-influence-in-u-s-state-republican-politics/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Oct 2010 16:25:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Adam</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[American Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ideology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[interest groups]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[parties]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[religion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social movements]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[state politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[state politics and policy quarterly]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://abstractpolitics.com/?p=298</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In a new article, Kimberly Conger tries to explain why the Christian Right is more influential in some states than in others. Most commentary about Christian conservatives focuses on the national context, but Conger points out that Christian conservatives are often most active at the state level. So what, then, explains their varying level of [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://abstractpolitics.com/2010/10/a-matter-of-context-christian-right-influence-in-u-s-state-republican-politics/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Electoral Costs of Party Loyalty in Congress</title>
		<link>http://abstractpolitics.com/2010/08/the-electoral-costs-of-party-loyalty-in-congress/</link>
		<comments>http://abstractpolitics.com/2010/08/the-electoral-costs-of-party-loyalty-in-congress/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Aug 2010 16:30:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Adam</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[American Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[american journal of political science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[congressional elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[experiment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ideology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legislatures]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[partisanship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[party government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[responsiveness]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[substantive representation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[voting and elections]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://abstractpolitics.com/?p=252</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yesterday, I wrote about Ansolabehere and Jones&#8217;s article in AJPS showing that voters really do hold members of Congress accountable for their voting record in Congress. On the very next page in AJPS, we find another article on the same theme. But Carson et al. want to change the way we think about this accountability. [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://abstractpolitics.com/2010/08/the-electoral-costs-of-party-loyalty-in-congress/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Constituents&#8217; Responses to Congressional Roll-Call Voting</title>
		<link>http://abstractpolitics.com/2010/08/constituents-responses-to-congressional-roll-call-voting/</link>
		<comments>http://abstractpolitics.com/2010/08/constituents-responses-to-congressional-roll-call-voting/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Aug 2010 16:04:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Adam</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[American Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[american journal of political science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[congressional elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ideology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legislatures]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[median voter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[partisanship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[public opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[responsiveness]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[substantive representation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[voter information]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[voting and elections]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://abstractpolitics.com/?p=248</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Turns out that democracy works, at least when it comes to voters holding members of Congress accountable for their voting record. For accountability to happen, we need to see three things: (1) Voters need to have specific opinions on specific issues before Congress; (2) voters need to know how their member of Congress actually voted [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://abstractpolitics.com/2010/08/constituents-responses-to-congressional-roll-call-voting/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The World Wide Web and the U.S. Political News Market</title>
		<link>http://abstractpolitics.com/2010/06/the-world-wide-web-and-the-u-s-political-news-market/</link>
		<comments>http://abstractpolitics.com/2010/06/the-world-wide-web-and-the-u-s-political-news-market/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jun 2010 15:40:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Adam</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[American Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[american journal of political science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cable television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ideology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media and politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[perceptual bias]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[polarization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[voter information]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[voting and elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[websites blogs and new media]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://abstractpolitics.com/?p=242</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[No serious observer of American politics would be surprised if you made two basic claims: (1) Small-circulation media outlets (websites, cable channels, independent newspapers) can be far more ideologically extreme than large-circulation outlets (network news) that need to appeal to a large audience to remain profitable, and (2) people prefer media sources that confirm their [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://abstractpolitics.com/2010/06/the-world-wide-web-and-the-u-s-political-news-market/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Personality and Political Attitudes: Relationships across Issue Domains and Political Contexts</title>
		<link>http://abstractpolitics.com/2010/05/personality-and-political-attitudes-relationships-across-issue-domains-and-political-contexts/</link>
		<comments>http://abstractpolitics.com/2010/05/personality-and-political-attitudes-relationships-across-issue-domains-and-political-contexts/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 May 2010 16:35:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Adam</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[American Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[american political science review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[genetics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ideology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[partisanship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[personality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[political psychology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[public opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[race]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[voting and elections]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://abstractpolitics.com/?p=193</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yesterday I wrote about Mondak et al.&#8217;s recent APSR article about personality and political participation. On the very next page of the same issue of APSR, you&#8217;ll find a closely related article by Gerber et al. Where Mondak et al. used the &#8220;Big Five&#8221; personality traits to predict participation in politics, Gerber et al. use [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://abstractpolitics.com/2010/05/personality-and-political-attitudes-relationships-across-issue-domains-and-political-contexts/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Candidate Positioning and Voter Choice</title>
		<link>http://abstractpolitics.com/2009/01/candidate-positioning-and-voter-choice/</link>
		<comments>http://abstractpolitics.com/2009/01/candidate-positioning-and-voter-choice/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2009 18:53:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Adam</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[American Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[american political science review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[experiment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ideology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[median voter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[partisanship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[polarization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[spatial models]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[voting and elections]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://abstractpolitics.com/?p=34</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Issue-based voting seems simple enough on its face: Support the candidate who will produce the policies you want. Simple as it sounds, though, there are three competing theories as to how voters actually make this decision. The lengthy previous literature on candidate positioning has failed to distinguish empirically between these three theories&#8211;something that Tomz and [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://abstractpolitics.com/2009/01/candidate-positioning-and-voter-choice/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

