<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	
	xmlns:adano="http://adambrown.info/p/xmlns/adano#" 
>

<channel>
	<title>Abstract Politics &#187; media and politics</title>
	<atom:link href="http://abstractpolitics.com/tag/media-and-politics/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://abstractpolitics.com</link>
	<description>Notes on political science research</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 14 Oct 2011 20:23:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>The World Wide Web and the U.S. Political News Market</title>
		<link>http://abstractpolitics.com/2010/06/the-world-wide-web-and-the-u-s-political-news-market/</link>
		<comments>http://abstractpolitics.com/2010/06/the-world-wide-web-and-the-u-s-political-news-market/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jun 2010 15:40:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Adam</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[American Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[american journal of political science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cable television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ideology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media and politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[perceptual bias]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[polarization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[voter information]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[voting and elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[websites blogs and new media]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://abstractpolitics.com/?p=242</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[No serious observer of American politics would be surprised if you made two basic claims: (1) Small-circulation media outlets (websites, cable channels, independent newspapers) can be far more ideologically extreme than large-circulation outlets (network news) that need to appeal to a large audience to remain profitable, and (2) people prefer media sources that confirm their [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://abstractpolitics.com/2010/06/the-world-wide-web-and-the-u-s-political-news-market/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Campaign Communications in U.S. Congressional Elections</title>
		<link>http://abstractpolitics.com/2009/09/campaign-communications-in-u-s-congressional-elections/</link>
		<comments>http://abstractpolitics.com/2009/09/campaign-communications-in-u-s-congressional-elections/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2009 19:13:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Adam</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[American Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[american political science review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[campaign advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[congressional elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[incumbency advantage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[low-information rationality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media and politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[minimal effects]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[partisanship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[public opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[voting and elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[websites blogs and new media]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://abstractpolitics.com/?p=121</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We&#8217;ve long known that most voters pay little attention to campaign rhetoric; they pay far more attention to partisanship, incumbency, and other easily accessible considerations (although rhetoric certainly has its place). Still, candidates work hard to develop arguments that, they hope, will sway voters to their side. The question: How do candidates decide what to [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://abstractpolitics.com/2009/09/campaign-communications-in-u-s-congressional-elections/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Framing Public Opinion in Competitive Democracies</title>
		<link>http://abstractpolitics.com/2008/05/framing-public-opinion-in-competitive-democracies/</link>
		<comments>http://abstractpolitics.com/2008/05/framing-public-opinion-in-competitive-democracies/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 May 2008 20:31:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Adam</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[American Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[american political science review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[campaign advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[framing effects]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media and politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[minimal effects]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[polarization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[public opinion]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://abstractpolitics.com/?p=13</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In a democracy, politicians and policy outcomes should be responsive to changes in public opinion. But what if politicians (or others, such as media commentators) were able to manipulate public opinion through propaganda or other, more subtle methods? We might appear on the surface to have democracy, but it would be a farce. The public [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://abstractpolitics.com/2008/05/framing-public-opinion-in-competitive-democracies/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Effects of &#8220;In-Your-Face&#8221; Television Discourse on Perceptions of a Legitimate Opposition</title>
		<link>http://abstractpolitics.com/2008/04/effects-of-in-your-face-television-discourse-on-perceptions-of-a-legitimate-opposition/</link>
		<comments>http://abstractpolitics.com/2008/04/effects-of-in-your-face-television-discourse-on-perceptions-of-a-legitimate-opposition/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 May 2008 00:23:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Adam</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[American Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[american political science review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[campaign advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[experiment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media and politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[polarization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[public opinion]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://abstractpolitics.com/?p=11</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Do we truly believe that ALL red-state residents are ignorant racist fascist knuckle-dragging NASCAR-obsessed cousin-marrying road-kill-eating tobacco-juice-dribbling gun-fondling religious fanatic rednecks; or that ALL blue-state residents are godless unpatriotic pierced-nose Volvo-driving France-loving left-wing Communist latte-sucking tofu-chomping holistic-wacko neurotic vegan weenie perverts? With that opening quotation from Dave Barry, Mutz introduces her central question: How do [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://abstractpolitics.com/2008/04/effects-of-in-your-face-television-discourse-on-perceptions-of-a-legitimate-opposition/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

