<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	
	xmlns:adano="http://adambrown.info/p/xmlns/adano#" 
>

<channel>
	<title>Abstract Politics &#187; religion</title>
	<atom:link href="http://abstractpolitics.com/tag/religion/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://abstractpolitics.com</link>
	<description>Notes on political science research</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 14 Oct 2011 20:23:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>The Party Faithful: Partisan Images, Candidate Religion, and the Electoral Impact of Party Identification</title>
		<link>http://abstractpolitics.com/2011/05/the-party-faithful-partisan-images-candidate-religion-and-the-electoral-impact-of-party-identification/</link>
		<comments>http://abstractpolitics.com/2011/05/the-party-faithful-partisan-images-candidate-religion-and-the-electoral-impact-of-party-identification/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 May 2011 16:50:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Adam</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[American Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[american journal of political science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[congressional elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[descriptive representation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[experiment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[framing effects]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[low-information rationality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[partisanship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[political behavior]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[public opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[religion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[voter information]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[voting and elections]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://abstractpolitics.com/?p=411</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[American voters tend to vote for their party&#8217;s candidate. That&#8217;s not news. The question is, why? Political science has usually relied on three answers. The psychological approach says that voters support their party because of a deep, emotional, psychological attachment to it (see The American Voter). The rational approach characterized partisanship as a &#8220;running tally&#8221; [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://abstractpolitics.com/2011/05/the-party-faithful-partisan-images-candidate-religion-and-the-electoral-impact-of-party-identification/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A Hundred Miles of Dry: Religion and the Persistence of Prohibition in the U.S. States</title>
		<link>http://abstractpolitics.com/2010/10/a-hundred-miles-of-dry-religion-and-the-persistence-of-prohibition-in-the-u-s-states/</link>
		<comments>http://abstractpolitics.com/2010/10/a-hundred-miles-of-dry-religion-and-the-persistence-of-prohibition-in-the-u-s-states/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Oct 2010 16:03:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Adam</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[American Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[religion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[state politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[state politics and policy quarterly]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://abstractpolitics.com/?p=303</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[America&#8217;s experiment with Prohibition was a failure. After 13 years of corruption, speakeasies, and an empowered mafia, the United States repealed Prohibition in 1933. With the federal ban on alcohol removed, authority over alcohol shifted to the states. Not a single state chose to continue to experiment. However, many counties did. Today, there remain 262 [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://abstractpolitics.com/2010/10/a-hundred-miles-of-dry-religion-and-the-persistence-of-prohibition-in-the-u-s-states/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A Matter of Context: Christian Right Influence in U.S. State Republican Politics</title>
		<link>http://abstractpolitics.com/2010/10/a-matter-of-context-christian-right-influence-in-u-s-state-republican-politics/</link>
		<comments>http://abstractpolitics.com/2010/10/a-matter-of-context-christian-right-influence-in-u-s-state-republican-politics/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Oct 2010 16:25:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Adam</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[American Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ideology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[interest groups]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[parties]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[religion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social movements]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[state politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[state politics and policy quarterly]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://abstractpolitics.com/?p=298</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In a new article, Kimberly Conger tries to explain why the Christian Right is more influential in some states than in others. Most commentary about Christian conservatives focuses on the national context, but Conger points out that Christian conservatives are often most active at the state level. So what, then, explains their varying level of [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://abstractpolitics.com/2010/10/a-matter-of-context-christian-right-influence-in-u-s-state-republican-politics/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Moral Bias in Large Elections: Theory and Experimental Evidence</title>
		<link>http://abstractpolitics.com/2009/09/moral-bias-in-large-elections-theory-and-experimental-evidence/</link>
		<comments>http://abstractpolitics.com/2009/09/moral-bias-in-large-elections-theory-and-experimental-evidence/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2009 18:46:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Adam</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[American Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[american political science review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[experiment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[religion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[turnout]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[voting and elections]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://abstractpolitics.com/?p=104</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In late 2003, Howard Dean lamented that southern white guys with confederate flags on their trucks ought to be voting for Democrats; after all, it&#8217;s the Democrats who want to help the working classes. Folks like Dean think that these southern white guys are being duped by wealthy upper-crust Republicans, who trick the southerners into [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://abstractpolitics.com/2009/09/moral-bias-in-large-elections-theory-and-experimental-evidence/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

