<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	
	xmlns:adano="http://adambrown.info/p/xmlns/adano#" 
>

<channel>
	<title>Abstract Politics &#187; voter information</title>
	<atom:link href="http://abstractpolitics.com/tag/voter-information/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://abstractpolitics.com</link>
	<description>Notes on political science research</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 29 Feb 2012 23:07:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>The Party Faithful: Partisan Images, Candidate Religion, and the Electoral Impact of Party Identification</title>
		<link>http://abstractpolitics.com/2011/05/the-party-faithful-partisan-images-candidate-religion-and-the-electoral-impact-of-party-identification/</link>
		<comments>http://abstractpolitics.com/2011/05/the-party-faithful-partisan-images-candidate-religion-and-the-electoral-impact-of-party-identification/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 May 2011 16:50:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>A.B.</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[American Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[american journal of political science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[congressional elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[descriptive representation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[experiment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[framing effects]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[low-information rationality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[partisanship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[political behavior]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[public opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[religion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[voter information]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[voting and elections]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://abstractpolitics.com/?p=411</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[American voters tend to vote for their party&#8217;s candidate. That&#8217;s not news. The question is, why? Political science has usually relied on three answers. The psychological approach says that voters support their party because of a deep, emotional, psychological attachment to it (see The American Voter). The rational approach characterized partisanship as a &#8220;running tally&#8221; [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://abstractpolitics.com/2011/05/the-party-faithful-partisan-images-candidate-religion-and-the-electoral-impact-of-party-identification/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Are Governors Responsible for the State Economy? Partisanship, Blame, and Divided Federalism</title>
		<link>http://abstractpolitics.com/2010/08/are-governors-responsible-for-the-state-economy-partisanship-blame-and-divided-federalism/</link>
		<comments>http://abstractpolitics.com/2010/08/are-governors-responsible-for-the-state-economy-partisanship-blame-and-divided-federalism/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Aug 2010 15:21:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>A.B.</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[American Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blame]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[federalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[journal of politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[partisanship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[perceptual bias]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[public opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[state politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[voter information]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[voting and elections]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://abstractpolitics.com/?p=261</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Tooting my own horn: Here&#8217;s the university&#8217;s press release for my recent article. It gets things mostly right. A down economy usually spells trouble for incumbents, but a new study shows that six Republicans up for re-election this year caught a break when John McCain lost the last presidential election. The analysis found that some [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://abstractpolitics.com/2010/08/are-governors-responsible-for-the-state-economy-partisanship-blame-and-divided-federalism/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Constituents&#8217; Responses to Congressional Roll-Call Voting</title>
		<link>http://abstractpolitics.com/2010/08/constituents-responses-to-congressional-roll-call-voting/</link>
		<comments>http://abstractpolitics.com/2010/08/constituents-responses-to-congressional-roll-call-voting/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Aug 2010 16:04:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>A.B.</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[American Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[american journal of political science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[congressional elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ideology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legislatures]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[median voter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[partisanship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[public opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[responsiveness]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[substantive representation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[voter information]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[voting and elections]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://abstractpolitics.com/?p=248</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Turns out that democracy works, at least when it comes to voters holding members of Congress accountable for their voting record. For accountability to happen, we need to see three things: (1) Voters need to have specific opinions on specific issues before Congress; (2) voters need to know how their member of Congress actually voted [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://abstractpolitics.com/2010/08/constituents-responses-to-congressional-roll-call-voting/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The World Wide Web and the U.S. Political News Market</title>
		<link>http://abstractpolitics.com/2010/06/the-world-wide-web-and-the-u-s-political-news-market/</link>
		<comments>http://abstractpolitics.com/2010/06/the-world-wide-web-and-the-u-s-political-news-market/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jun 2010 15:40:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>A.B.</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[American Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[american journal of political science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cable television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ideology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media and politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[perceptual bias]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[polarization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[voter information]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[voting and elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[websites blogs and new media]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://abstractpolitics.com/?p=242</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[No serious observer of American politics would be surprised if you made two basic claims: (1) Small-circulation media outlets (websites, cable channels, independent newspapers) can be far more ideologically extreme than large-circulation outlets (network news) that need to appeal to a large audience to remain profitable, and (2) people prefer media sources that confirm their [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://abstractpolitics.com/2010/06/the-world-wide-web-and-the-u-s-political-news-market/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

